Your how-to: Evaluating the initial impact of mental health programs

Category
Process and Procedures
Sub-category
Program Management and Implementation
Level
Maturity Matrix Level 2

Evaluating the initial impact of mental health programs in your workplace refers to the process undertaken to measure the immediate effectiveness and results of any newly implemented mental wellbeing initiatives within your company. It involves using objective and subjective methods to understand how these programs have influenced the overall mental wellbeing of your employees. 

This assessment step is crucial in determining if your initiatives have achieved their primary goals, such as reducing stress levels, decreasing absenteeism, fostering resilience or improving productivity. 

Understanding the initial impact is integral to making necessary adjustments and refinements, ensuring your mental health programs continue to align with your workforce's unique needs. This process is undertaken in line with the principles of WHS (Work Health and Safety) legislation within Australia, which recommends regular assessments of workplace initiatives aimed at promoting workforce wellbeing.

Step by step instructions

Step 1

Identifying the Objectives: Make sure to establish the objectives of the programs you are implementing. Since you are assessing the initial impact of these programs, your objectives should be the results you hope to see immediately after implementing these programs. The objectives can range from decreasing employee stress levels to encouraging resilience across teams, or improving productivity.

Step 3

Initiating Employee Feedback: After establishing what's to be measured, collect initial feedback from the employees participating in the program. This can be accomplished through anonymous surveys, suggestion boxes, or face-to-face meetings. These channels will give you insight into how the programs have been received so far.

Step 5

Analysing the Data: Now that you have collected your data, the next stage is to analyse it. This means comparing your Key Performance Indicators with the data. How successful have you been in meeting your KPIs? Aligning the KPI data with your initial objectives will show you the programs' primary impacts.

Step 7

Reporting: Prepare a comprehensive report that summarises your evaluation findings and the recommended next steps. Make sure to take note of any significant improvements or concerns raised by employees.

Step 2

Setting up Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Following the establishment of the programs’ objectives, identify Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that will help you measure the attainment of these objectives. KPIs could include survey results, absenteeism rates, or productivity statistics.

Step 4

Conducting Formal Assessments: Next, arrange structured assessments to provide a more objective evaluation of the programs. These may include psychological resilience tests or productivity measurements. Remember to be mindful of privacy concerns when conducting these assessments.

Step 6

Making Necessary Adjustments: Based on the evaluation, identify areas within the program that need improvement. This could involve tweaking specific activities, modes of participation or adding more facilitators. The purpose of this step is to ensure that your mental health programs remain responsive and relevant to your employees' needs.

Step 8

Reviewing in line with WHS Legislation: Lastly, after you've completed your evaluation, compare your mental health programs with the WHS legislation’s proposals. Ensure your initiatives align with this legislation in order to guarantee compliance. If required, consider seeking assistance or guidance from a professional familiar with WHS legislation in Australia.

Use this template to implement

To ensure you can execute seamlessly, download the implementation template.

Pitfalls to avoid

Ignoring confidentiality and privacy concerns

Be aware of the significant ethical and legal issues associated with confidentiality and privacy, particularly since mental health is a sensitive personal topic. Be sure all data collection adheres to the Australian Privacy Principles under the Privacy Act 1988. Violating this trust can have severe legal consequences and significantly harm employee trust and participation.

Lack of ongoing assessment

Initial impact evaluation is important, but neglecting ongoing measurement of program effectiveness is a common pitfall. Regular assessment over time provides valuable information about the program's ongoing relevance and the gradual shifts in organisational mental health.

Expecting immediate results

Mental health interventions may take time to show their full impact. Expecting immediate, substantial change can result in premature conclusions about the program's effectiveness.

Neglecting diverse needs

Workplace mental health programs often fail when they do not acknowledge and incorporate the diverse range of the employees' needs. It is crucial to include various dimensions such as age, ethnicity, gender, and other aspects of diversity to ensure your approach is inclusive and effective.

Relying solely on self-reported data

Self-reports provide valuable insights into employee wellbeing, but they should not be the only source of information. Employee perceptions may not always align with their actual mental health status. It’s important to also consider objective measures, such as absenteeism rates, use of mental health resources etc.

Ignoring stakeholder perspectives

It’s imperative to consider the perspectives of different stakeholders in the evaluation. This includes employees, management, trade unions, and healthcare providers. A multi-perspective approach will mean better understanding of the actual impact of the program.