Your how-to: Creating a basic framework for stakeholder feedback on mental health programs

Category
Leadership and Governance
Sub-category
Stakeholder Engagement and Communication
Level
Maturity Matrix Level 1

Creating a basic framework for stakeholder feedback on mental health programs in the workplace is a structured approach to gather, analyse, and apply the views of those affected by or having an influence on mental health and wellbeing initiatives in the workplace. 

This involves identifying key stakeholders - these may include employees at all levels, management, trade unions, relevant government bodies such as Safe Work Australia, and possibly external providers of wellbeing services. From here, you devise a strategic plan for collecting their feedback on existing or proposed mental health programs. 

Feedback could be gathered via methods like surveys, interviews, or focus groups. The data collected provides insights into the relevance, effectiveness, inclusivity, and reach of the mental health programs, and helps inform decisions about potential improvements or changes.

It is crucial to ensure the framework, and any resulting actions, aligns with the 'Work Health and Safety Act 2011' requirements, particularly on the duties of employers to maintain a safe and healthy workplace. Consideration of the 'Privacy Act 1988' is also necessary to ensure stakeholder information is collected, stored, and used responsibly.

Step by step instructions

Step 1

Identifying the Stakeholders: Your first task is to identify who the key stakeholders are. These will likely be employees at all levels, management, trade unions, and potentially external providers of mental health services. Don't forget to consider relevant government bodies, such as Safe Work Australia.

Step 3

Creating a Plan for Gathering Feedback: You need to decide on the best methods for soliciting stakeholder feedback. This could be through surveys, interviews, focus groups, or a combination of these. Making this choice largely depends on the size and nature of your workplace, the resources at your disposal, and what's most suitable for your stakeholders.

Step 5

Gathering the Feedback: Implement your feedback process, ensuring it's conducted fairly and responsibly. Communicate clearly with stakeholders about why their feedback is being requested, how it will be used, and how their privacy will be protected.

Step 7

Building Actions from Feedback: The final step is developing actions or recommendations based on the feedback. This may involve revising existing programs, designing new ones, or changing the organisational approach to mental health.

Step 2

Defining Stakeholder Engagement Objectives: Define what you need from your stakeholders. This could be insights into their experiences with existing programs, their thoughts on proposed initiatives, or their perspectives on your organisation's overall approach to mental health. Being clear about your engagement objectives will guide the entire feedback process.

Step 4

Designing Feedback Tools: Design the actual tools that will be used to gather feedback. Depending on the approach chosen in step 3, this might be a survey form, interview questions, or an outline for facilitating a focus group. Make sure these tools are designed in a way that will capture the information you need to meet your stated objectives.

Step 6

Analysing the Feedback: Once the feedback has been gathered, it needs to be analysed in a systematic way to draw out key themes, identify areas of consensus or disagreement, and understand the implications for your mental health programs.

Step 8

Reflect and Breathe: This step can be challenging, so it's important to take a moment to breathe and reflect. Pause to consider the progress made, the obstacles encountered, and the lessons learned. This reflection will not only help in gaining clarity but also in maintaining a balanced perspective, allowing for thoughtful and deliberate decision-making moving forward.

Use this template to implement

To ensure you can execute seamlessly, download the implementation template.

Pitfalls to avoid

Neglecting Confidentiality and Anonymity

Ensuring all feedback collected is kept confidential and anonymous is of utmost importance when dealing with sensitive topics like mental health. Lack of privacy and fear of stigma might deter employees from participating actively, hence the feedback gathered might not reflect the reality. To avoid this pitfall, ensure that the feedback mechanism you adopt is anonymous and the process completely confidential.

Lack of Clarity in Questions Asked

You could miss vital feedback if your questions are inscrutable or vagueness dominates. Remember, clarity is key. Keep your queries straightforward, using plain language and avoiding jargon to gain the most unambiguous responses possible.

Overlooking Feedback

Don't ask for stakeholder feedback only to shelve it. One of the biggest pitfalls is not reviewing and actioning the comments received. Feedback ignored can lead to employee disengagement, and breeds scepticism around feedback exercises. Structure a process to review, analyse, and institute the feedback into the mental health programs, and communicate these changes to your stakeholders.

Ignoring Cultural Diversity

Australia is a culturally and linguistically diverse nation. If your workforce is diverse, design your mental health feedback mechanism in a way that takes into account its cultural diversity and linguistic proficiencies. Neglecting cultural sensitivities can lead to misrepresentation in feedback and program inefficiencies.

Not Providing Context

Failing to give clear directions or explaining why collecting feedback is necessary may lead to apathy from your employees. It is crucial to clearly state the importance of their feedback in improving mental health initiatives in your organisation. Giving context motivates engagement in the feedback process.

Non-compliance with Regulation

Irrespective of your intentions, non-compliance with Australia's privacy laws and Safe Work Australia's guidelines on workplace mental health is a significant pitfall. Ensure your feedback framework is designed in compliance with these regulations to avoid legal repercussions.